Belenen (belenen) wrote,
Belenen
belenen

ethical storytelling ratings & reviews for 17 Again (2009), Eva (2011), and Love Birds (2011)

17 Again (2009 USA) [Comedy/Fantasy] Director: Burr Steers Writer: Jason Filardi
+1 -- slightly subversive in that the "wife's" life improves dramatically when ze dumps the main character, and ze's portrayed as confident and complete.
+1 -- adding a point for the fact that the main character doesn't get creepy when put in a 17 year old body among 17 year old girls who want to have sex with zir.
-1 -- for forcing a kiss on the "wife." consent requires desire plus conscious choice.
-1 -- main character passes 4 geeks dressed up in "girly" things (implied to have been forced by the boys laughing at them outside) and locked in a display case, makes a face and DOES NOTHING. No further mention is made.
0 -- doesn't directly affirm stereotypes, but doesn't break them down either: at least the "bad boyfriend" is just called bad and it's not excused as "boy behavior."
-1 -- primarily a vehicle for white, male, cis, het, financially-unworried, non-disabled, neurotypical character
-1 -- main supporting character (or majority of ensemble cast) also white, male, cis, het, financially-unworried, non-disabled, and neurotypical
+1 -- minor character who is female is confident and in charge, yet not demonized or desexed or overpowered. Ze does change zir mind about a pressure-y suitor, but in reaction to learning they had something in common, not as giving in to manipulation.

Total: -1 mildly bad. On plot and character development, I'd say it was solidly okay, but nothing to shout about. I'd say it's worth watching once if you feel like some fluff - 2.5 star (out of five).

-------------


Eva (2011 Spain) [Drama/Sci-fi] Director: Kike Maíllo Writers: Sergi Belbel, Cristina Clemente, Martí Roca, Aintza Serra
+1 no stereotyped-by-gender characters
+1 female characters are 3D
+1 just barely passes the Bechdel test
-1 affirms stereotypes (in dialogue)
-1 primarily a vehicle for white, male, cis, het, financially-unworried, non-disabled, neurotypical character
+1 for respectful handling of non-human sentience

Total: +2 mildly good. On plot and character development, it was very interesting, well-paced, thought-provoking, and emotional but not luridly so. For me it's a 4 star, meaning it's worth watching more than once, but not more than thrice.

-------------


Love Birds (2011 New Zealand) [Comedy/Romance] Director: Paul Murphy Writer: Nick Ward
+1 main female character is 3D and not stereotyped -- but the others are.
+1 main male character is not at all grabby or sexually pushy. Sad that this is rare enough to be a plus, but there you go.
+1-1 subversive in that at one point wmchfundnt main character says "no" to gender segregation, but at another point it is allowed with a "fair enough" from the one being excluded
-1 primarily a vehicle for white, male, cis, het, financially-unworried, non-disabled, neurotypical character
+1 main supporting character is a duck, and it's treated kindly and respectfully, yet not put in opposition to a woman (usually when animals are real characters they become a sort of competing love interest for the wmchfundnt person and then get chosen over the woman, with an implied nobility to this choice)
-1 marginalized people considered not viable love interests, used as background -- and in favor of the slimiest white guy who objectifies and excludes!
+1 pretty awesome handling of single motherhood -- main female does not center life around child or man, but makes zir own choices carefully.

Total: +2 which for a romantic comedy is damn good. On plot and character development, it was above average, and it made me cry with happiness at one point. Also a 4 star.
Tags: films / shows, lookism, social justice / feminism
Subscribe

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 2 comments